X band was off because I didn't think many people still run with X band anymore. Adding any bandwidth should increase the scan cycle time. Please refer to Note1 to get an idea of what your cycle time would be if you included X band.
It depends on where you are. I've seen NHSP with a Stalker at 34.917 on I-95. It's fairly common to see them in upstate NY as well. Any performance difference will likely be minimal, so it wouldn't hurt to run Seg 6 for awhile to be safe.
Yeah I normally run 6 but was thinking about switching to Narrow to get that little extra quickness. I guess I’ll just leave 6 on and keep an eye on it..
Dat R squared -value doe.
do we know if the ka filter reduces range on this FW? (aware range was not tested by the OP)
If I remember correctly, Ka filter on actually made it faster, thereby increasing range. Since the Ka filter has not been touched at all, the results should be the same.
Depends on where you live. If you live in an area where 34.7 Stalker guns drift and are not required to be certified, you're better running Narrow or 2/5/6/8 if the guns drift way high. In reality, on the Uniden R1/3/7 or DFR8/9 the difference in scan times is in low milliseconds because of the digital architecture.
Well, have not gone back and looked up..... However with R3 and R7, the folks published testing when they hit the market, had 2/5/8 Used. When Ka nom segmented, distance on Ka went down enough to notice. And those far off weak I/O like pick ups did not show up.
It should be the same or exceedingly close.
Freaking thank you
Done
