Learning to Fly
- Jan 31, 2021
- Reaction score
Agree - looks like S350
Good idea @dudeinnz, exactly what I was thinking... Get a V1 for laser detection!! Quite ironic I actually had to reprogram a friends Gen1 V1 today with laser off as it was driving him nuts!!!! Falses to just about all DRL's, he's super excited to be running Ka only nowIf you can nab a photo, perhaps someone here can identify it.
That is worrying, either of you have a V1 for testing if its laser? Or perhaps get Zak to make a pass by at some stage.
@Aucklandradar have you noticed anything in Auckland?
@Mithheru P.S happy to send up my V1gen 1 to you if you think it may be helpful for testing laser.
Been covered by ALP for a while;
AL said:Details of the 4.3.9 update (8/15/14)
1. Traffistar S350 Laser scanner support added.
2. Various LIDARs code improved.
3. Some error signalization bugs fixed.
4. Updating process improved for Control Set.
5. USB functioning further improved.
Ok, just went passed this van a couple of minutes ago on Whakatiki St in Upper Hutt. Got 24.032 on K band. Will take a video on my phone when I go pass again shortly.
On the way back got 24.30 on K band facing van. Other reading of 24.032 was coming from behind the van.Ok, just went passed this van a couple of minutes ago on Whakatiki St in Upper Hutt. Got 24.032 on K band. Will take a video on my phone when I go pass again shortly.
If that's a Redflex (slant radar Speed Camera), I see a fault in the setup that could be deemed illegal. It's too close to a bend in the road.
Sorry wrong video, here's the correct one...
Which may explain why LAYxxx was then showing redlfelx again, they may be just testing and will then request approval - which then makes it harder - it’s almost like they are doing an I/O in the vans , then swapping backLast approved device was the redflex NK7 as shown here- Redflex approval
My searches for anything new or under testing are not revealing anything. As Lou said, if its not approved for use, I doubt they would be able to issue a ticket. Also, I am unsure if under NZ law they need to gazette anything they are testing.
It's most likely/hopefully testing. I am sure you just can't plonk a speed surveillance device and start testing it without some red-tape. Must be a record of that red-tape somewhere.Which may explain why LAYxxx was then showing redlfelx again, they may be just testing and will then request approval - which then makes it harder - it’s almost like they are doing an I/O in the vans , then swapping back
Or....running a dummy to throw people ?