- Joined
- Jun 5, 2013
- Messages
- 7,438
- Reaction score
- 11,542
Ended up going on a socially distanced "vacation", renting out a house on AirBnb and doing delivery-only groceries to try to both limit my own exposure as well as be considerate to the town I'm visiting. This time I decided to take our Model 3 with the V1G2. Overall I loved using the V1G2 and find it right up there with the R7 as my detectors of choice:
The positives:
The negatives:
All in all, the V1G2 would get a 9 out of 10. That's about the same score I'd give the R7. They both have shared strengths (Ka range), and while the V1G2 right now has a few more quirks, the R7's BSM filtering in today's shape is definitely inferior in my experience compared to the V1G2. Overall though, I think the V1G2 is quite dependable/reliable. It's certainly nothing like the RL360c launch where it once in a while shows potential but as an overall package seems not very usable.
The positives:
- The K band BSM filtering is simply the best I've experienced on the market. We found one GM car that set it off but we drove by so many Hondas, Acuras, Odysseys, Mazdas, and so on and were simply floored by the V1G2 staying silent (this is in big L mode). Not even the R7 in City is this silent, and the Max360Ci in Auto can't filter out many of these vehicles either. As far as I've experienced, there's nothing else on the market that is this quiet. K Block seems to help the R7 band-aid the Acura 24.199 falses, but it doesn't seem to help with the GM 24.16x/17x systems though the V1G2 seems to handle that well.
- Extreme Ka range is definitely up there with the R7 or above. Every detection was consistent and impressive.
- On CO, the ramp-up is absolutely amazing. Like we were able to accurately label each kind of ramp-up -- IO, CO, "we're about to see the cop", "I think they're in traffic ahead of us".... and that's something we were honestly not very successful doing with the R7 primarily because the R7's ramp-up pegs at max too early.
The negatives:
- Had more Ka falses than I wanted. Most of them were at oddball out-of-the-box frequencies and only presented at 1 bar. Maybe 25% of those got J'ed out. Overall IMO VR needs to work on the Ka band filtering. On the bright side, unlike the R7, the V1G2 never falsed on 34.7. The R7 for me still has a nonzero occurrence of giving 1 blip 34.699/34.700 alerts that don't amount to anything. As much as I try to convince myself it's an extreme range pickup, I strongly suspect most of those to be falses. In CA, falsing on 34.7 is super annoying.
- Had 1 Ka encounter ghost up to 9 bogeys right around when it was transitioning to the rear
- Watch out for the V1G2 ramp-up indications! I witnessed at least one kill zone before 6 bars of alert -- while the alert bar scaling results in better threat locating, it does mean even weak signals need to be taken more seriously.
- Often times after 1 K band PT (like a speed sign or other legitimate PT), it seems like K Verifier lets through BSM systems too until those systems get out of range.
- The V1G2 was 0 for 2 on LIDAR traps -- passed two CHPs actively shooting Truspeed and the V1G2 did not go off for either. Note that the Truspeed has a notoriously narrow beam, but this is a reminder that no matter how sensitive your LIDAR detector is, passive LIDAR scatter is not something you can bank on.
- A few cases I had the arrows not flip after passing a threat. Note that the Model 3 does have slightly RF blocking glass and oddly high rear glass so I suspect the rear antenna didn't get too much of a whiff of the signal.
All in all, the V1G2 would get a 9 out of 10. That's about the same score I'd give the R7. They both have shared strengths (Ka range), and while the V1G2 right now has a few more quirks, the R7's BSM filtering in today's shape is definitely inferior in my experience compared to the V1G2. Overall though, I think the V1G2 is quite dependable/reliable. It's certainly nothing like the RL360c launch where it once in a while shows potential but as an overall package seems not very usable.