What RD testing begs for...

Discussion in 'Countermeasure Testing & Related Videos' started by daryl adams, Nov 9, 2018 at 10:14 PM.

  1. daryl adams

    daryl adams Premium Member General User Premium Member

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    5
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2018
    There are so many variables across test beds in the area of RD test. Most testing, although well intentioned, involves an exact state of traffic/ signal that can never be repeated. Not really fair. Wouldn't it be nice if we had a testbed that had a "set" track with a "known", challenging set of problems/ issues for an RD to address/ resolve? Static distance, signal, obstructions, noise, other environmental factors. The holy grail of test beds. A test bed from which not only different detectors could be challenged/ tested, but different versions of firmware could be tested. No one provides detailed tests across firmware versions of all the available platforms. We "assume" no changes have been made. We "know" however that variations in function effect other daemons/ functions on a fixed hardware platform with fixed resources. In the end, aren't we really just testing firmware? Doesn't it make sense to test across a fixed test bed?
     
    Freebird likes this.
  2. Deacon

    Deacon TXCTG Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    6,742
    Likes Received:
    6,908
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2016
    Location:
    Hill Country, TX
    If you have an old airport you’d like to donate for the purpose, I’ll get working on it.
     
  3. Heywood

    Heywood Learning Something New, Still Dying Stupid Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    2,045
    Country:
    Canada
    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Location:
    Alberta Canada
    Bonneville Salt Flats is all yours. Enjoy lol.
     
    sdrawkcab likes this.
  4. CJR238

    CJR238 -CMS Article Admin- Administrator Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    25,875
    Likes Received:
    16,176
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2010
    Location:
    CT. MZDA 3. ALP, V1/RedLine/Waze
    That's why we do multiple runs on a predetermined low traffic course. Some test courses also test different aspects of a RD. Like speed, long range, off axis...

    Generally different versions of firmware do not effect performance and more times than not its mostly feature based differences.

    Even Airports and flat salt beads would not provide as accurate testing as it does with real roads.

    Good thread for general testing guidelines: www.rdforum.org: How to test your RD for general use
     
    Brainstorm69 and Heywood like this.
  5. HeartDoctor

    HeartDoctor PSL + 5 never more;) Advanced User

    Messages:
    1,495
    Likes Received:
    2,322
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    May 30, 2016
    Location:
    SE Florida
    Your testtbed better be in an climate controlled environment because humidity, atmospheric pressure, suspended dust, pollen, air temperature, etc. might all impact results.
     
    sdrawkcab and CJR238 like this.
  6. Heywood

    Heywood Learning Something New, Still Dying Stupid Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    2,045
    Country:
    Canada
    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Location:
    Alberta Canada
    Probably the best reason a testbed scenario is unrealistic. You can throw temperature in there as well.

    Even the placement of a radar emitting devise. Such as inside a warm vehicle, or an antenna mounted outside changes some things.

    The best is constant testing in different environments and taking an average over multiple runs as we do now.

    We have wild DA’s (Density of the Air or atmosphere) where I am. If you race you know what I’m talking about.

    I can go out Friday and get a DA of 2200 ft. Which is correct for my location. I’ll go out Monday and the DA will be equal to 4400 ft above sea level.

    I have to use the Dragtime app to bring the results down to sea level to see if I made any gains.

    If we see results in about’s 300 ft of each other over various tests across the continent, i would consider them a good representation of what each detector is capable of.

    The other issue is the capability of each detector. We do know that there are the occasional hot copies that comes out and squew’s the results between 2 identical detectors on the the same FW.

    A test bed across the board, imho, is somewhat an unrealistic expectation. We need more people that are willing to invest a little time and resource to do their own testing following some simple set ups as suggested above.

    Try some back roads and set up some realistic situations that any Leo would use against you. Mounting a radar gun on top of an overpass and shooting straight down a highway is kind of cool, but not something that’s always common. Not here anyways where detectors are legal.

    Take multiple runs and post the results. The more the better.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    CJR238 likes this.
  7. Deacon

    Deacon TXCTG Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    6,742
    Likes Received:
    6,908
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2016
    Location:
    Hill Country, TX
    Seriously, it’s all something I’ve thought about. The ideal, short of a custom built facility on a large plot of land, would be essentially an old air field. Plenty of length for different angles of attack and such, no traffic, 100% consistency of placement and reasonable consistency of conditions, etc. The only thing better with be a large race circuit with significant elevation changes, like Sochi or even Austin.
     
    sdrawkcab likes this.