Radenso Pro M vs. MRCT (USA)

cihkal

Forum Retiree - All the Best!
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Acceptus
Newly Registered
Apr 21, 2014
3,042
4,950
#1
Edit 9/3/28: I recommend using MRCT Narrow and MR Filter high for great detection and filtering of Multaradar falses. To get this combo to work so that it doesn't filter the cameras completely or just not detect them, turn on MRCD Narrow as well. This allows the M to detect the USA MRCT cameras with the most aggressive filtering combo, and it provides great performance. Likely a minor software bug in US9 which requires this. With this discovery by a user in NYC I now see the M as the king of K band false alert filtering with also the best performance/filtering combo on Multaradar threats.

Note: Tapatalk goofs up how the videos are listed, but in a browser they are listed nicely.

Recently I found out through other members' hard work that all of the speed cameras in Chicago are MRCT units. I always wondered why all detectors would either not alert at all, or in the case of the V1 alert right at the camera. I was pleasantly surprised because I now have a Pro M and live very close to one of these darn devices! Before I get to the testing videos and highlight of some of the results, below is information on the cameras:

Picture of the cameras
Speed Camera.jpg


Camera Threats in Chicago: Red = Red Light Cam, Yellow = License Plate Cam, Green = Speed Cam
Camera Threats Map.png

Specifics on the camera I tested against
Speed Camera Data.png

FCCID listing for the camera posted as an attachment below in this post...

As for the results, I made runs with every setting combo. As time goes on I will continue to make runs since it will take quite a bit of data to get a good feel on how each settings combo really works. From my understanding from posts on MRCD (different threat) results can be all over the place. Overall though, for a tough threat like this I am very happy with the results.

Quick notes on findings from multiple runs which are not all highlighted in this post:
  1. I recommend MRCT Wide and MR Filter High for adequate detection and minimized false alerts.
  2. I would not run MRCT Narrow and MR Filter High as the M would not alert to the camera at all or in a ticket scenario almost every time I tested with these settings. More runs need to be completed, but I did not see this with other settings.
Snapshot of results with my preferred settings of MRCT Wide and MR Filter High:

Approaching the camera with radar shooting at my car
MRCT Wide MR Filter High.png

Approaching the camera FF, run #1
MRCT Wide MR Filter High FF #1.png

Approaching the camera FF, run #2
MRCT Wide MR Filter Wide FF #2.png


Videos of each run.. sorry for the brief language in one (I think)
Radenso Pro M MRCT Wide & MR Filter Off vs. MRCT FF

Radenso Pro M MRCT Wide & MR Filter Low vs. MRCT FF


Radenso Pro M MRCT Wide & MR Filter High vs. MRCT FF #1


Radenso Pro M MRCT Wide & MR Filter High vs. MRCT FF #2


Radenso Pro M MRCT Wide & MR Filter High vs. MRCT


Radenso Pro M MRCT Narrow & MR Filter Off vs. MRCT FF


Radenso Pro M MRCT Narrow & MR Filter Low vs. MRCT FF


Radenso Pro M MRCT Narrow & MR Filter High vs. MRCT FF
 

Attachments

Last edited:

InsipidMonkey

Premium Monkey
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Acceptus
Newly Registered
Mar 22, 2017
4,645
8,005
New England
#2
I would not run MRCT Narrow and MR Filter High as the M would not alert to the camera at all or in a ticket scenario almost every time I tested with these settings.
Interesting observation. I wonder what defines MRCT Wide vs Narrow, as I believe they scan/sweep multiple frequencies during operation?
 

dudeinnz

NZCTG
Moderator
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Oct 14, 2015
1,990
1,892
Christchurch
#3
Awesome work!

Does vertical mounting help with MRCT? Another test for another weekend perhaps.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

cihkal

Forum Retiree - All the Best!
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Acceptus
Newly Registered
Apr 21, 2014
3,042
4,950
#4
Awesome work!

Does vertical mounting help with MRCT? Another test for another weekend perhaps.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not sure what the polarization is of these cameras, but I'll find out! If they are like the newest Gatso then I'll see if I can order the vertical mount Genevo recently released.
 

cihkal

Forum Retiree - All the Best!
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Acceptus
Newly Registered
Apr 21, 2014
3,042
4,950
#5
Interesting observation. I wonder what defines MRCT Wide vs Narrow, as I believe they scan/sweep multiple frequencies during operation?
I'm not sure, but I did find a post with someone testing the Genevo One M against MRCT and having issues narrow. I think Genevo mentioned that narrow was sometimes missing the signal. Who knows if that is even relevant anymore and plus since that's the One M and this is the Pro M it might not even apply.

I'll do more testing and give the results to Radenso so they can look into if possible.
 

dudeinnz

NZCTG
Moderator
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Oct 14, 2015
1,990
1,892
Christchurch
#6

cihkal

Forum Retiree - All the Best!
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Acceptus
Newly Registered
Apr 21, 2014
3,042
4,950
#7

Heywood

Learning Something New, Still Dying Stupid
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
May 12, 2016
2,254
3,195
Alberta Canada
#8
Very well done.

Great work and great detail.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

andi

Learning to Fly
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Oct 3, 2015
74
118
Germany, Bavaria
#9
Nice Videos!
MRCT has vertical Polarisation.
 

cihkal

Forum Retiree - All the Best!
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Acceptus
Newly Registered
Apr 21, 2014
3,042
4,950
#10
Nice Videos!
MRCT has vertical Polarisation.
Thanks for the confirmation, then that means the traditional horizontal mounts works best right?
 

milkman

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Acceptus
Newly Registered
Dec 6, 2010
14,369
5,110
Missouri
#11
Very Nice! Thanks for sharing!
 

Brainstorm69

TXCTG 2016 MOTY
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
May 23, 2015
7,663
14,193
Lone Star State
#12
Great job! Nice write-up!
 

Up All Night

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Nov 27, 2015
2,670
2,456
Cleveland, OH
#13

andi

Learning to Fly
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Oct 3, 2015
74
118
Germany, Bavaria
#14

cihkal

Forum Retiree - All the Best!
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Acceptus
Newly Registered
Apr 21, 2014
3,042
4,950
#15
Mother of God!
Are they on the freeways too?
View attachment 85521
Nice documentary Thanks.


Posted from my iPhone using the RDF Mobile App!
Thankfully they only appear on city streets from everything I've seen. Chicago wants their money, but they're also concerned with traffic flow. It's all stupid. For redlight cameras they've made the yellow light instantly change. You can't make it through a yellow without getting a ticket or be traveling at triple digits. People watch the crosswalk timers and will slow at a green light because they know in 2sec it's going to change and they'd be ticketed for getting caught in a yellow to red light transition - it's that fast.

Chicago is probably one of the worst places in the US for automated ticketing measures now that we know they have MRCT. Thankfully they keep a public database on all these threats.

On an unrelated note, MRCT narrow and MR Filter low provides adequate detection and thus far fewer false alerts than MRCT wide and MR Filter high. Need more seat time, but this may become my preferred settings combo.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
 

hiddencam

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Oct 29, 2010
10,845
21,368
#16
Great work! That last video of no detection in narrow - yikes. So yeah, looks like your recommended wide MR filter high is the way to go when running the Pro-M.

By the way, are the other fixed cameras locations you listed are adequately covered by the Pro-M's Speed Cam alerts. I wonder if Waze covers them?

I guess if the Speed Cam alerts have the fixed ones covered it's no big deal what the detection range is, but for ones they move around, that could be nightmarish!
 

eric15178

If you ain't 1st you're last-Ricky Bobby
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
May 4, 2018
67
40
wisconsin
#17
That's insane. So need international units in the US? Also with the bogus super fast yellow to red lights, what are you supposed to do in winter time. Slam on the brakes to not "run the red" and get rear ended by the guy behind you? If the roads suck, or you're just stuck in the middle of a intersection you just have to go through. People just need to drive with some sense and handle themselves. Though sure that's just revenue collecting rather than safety-actually the opposite of safety way more accidents like that
 

cihkal

Forum Retiree - All the Best!
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Acceptus
Newly Registered
Apr 21, 2014
3,042
4,950
#18
Great work! That last video of no detection in narrow - yikes. So yeah, looks like your recommended wide MR filter high is the way to go when running the Pro-M.

By the way, are the other fixed cameras locations you listed are adequately covered by the Pro-M's Speed Cam alerts. I wonder if Waze covers them?

I guess if the Speed Cam alerts have the fixed ones covered it's no big deal what the detection range is, but for ones they move around, that could be nightmarish!
For the most part the Pro M's database covers the cameras pretty well, and Waze does to. You def can get by with a RD that doesn't have MRCT capabilities, but the nice part is just knowing if the camera is in fact on and targeting you. Some of the cameras turn on and off, supposedly, for traffic flow.

For the Pro M, it won't alert with Narrow and High. It will for all others with narrow and low working pretty well. Wide and High works really well but gives more falses than narrow and low.
 

Hügel66

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
MFG/Vendor
Newly Registered
Aug 29, 2011
1,355
5,412
Northern Kentucky
radenso.com
#19
For the most part the Pro M's database covers the cameras pretty well, and Waze does to. You def can get by with a RD that doesn't have MRCT capabilities, but the nice part is just knowing if the camera is in fact on and targeting you. Some of the cameras turn on and off, supposedly, for traffic flow.

For the Pro M, it won't alert with Narrow and High. It will for all others with narrow and low working pretty well. Wide and High works really well but gives more falses than narrow and low.
I believe they rotate the cameras between different locations. The cameras are quite expensive so they place them in one location for a few days, then they take them to another location etc. Motorists just don't know if the camera is in place or if it is just a dummy. You only know for sure if you run a detector capable of detecting the radar.
 

Biohazardous

Finding the loopholes
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Oct 23, 2015
1,054
1,163
In the north
#20
Annnd this is why I avoid IL when I head south. Good read, I will be heading to IN in September with my Pro M.