Stinger VIP 4.2.10

Discussion in 'Stinger' started by nano, Jun 22, 2018.

  1. dinkydi

    dinkydi Premium Member Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    5,378
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Country:
    Australia
    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2011
    Location:
    back on the road again
    wow u guys rock
     
    beingaware likes this.
  2. whitewiskers

    whitewiskers Learning to Drive General User

    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    16
    Country:
    Canada
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2013
    I would like to provide my experience so far with the VIP 4.2.10.

    1) I did a "Remove false list data" followed by a "Reset to factory Defaults". The I turned off the system, waited and powered it up again.
    2) Then I installed the VIP 4.2.10 update and went for a 700+ klms. trip.
    The arrows went everywhere, such that I could not tell from where the radar was coming, EVEN when I knew what was the source, i.e. speed sign. The arrows bounced all over, front, rear, sides, front and rear together, sides together, even three quarter directions together. I seemed to receive however fewer BSM's etc. I did a "realign antennas" during that trip, turning off the system and then restarting it. It did not seemed to have made any improvement on that first day's trip.
    The next day I did another drive and the arrows now are much steadier, more like they should be, pointing to the source and around as it is passed.
    I made sure my other setting were as before I installed 4.2.10 from 4.0.52. Apples to apples, so to speak.

    Can anyone tell me the functional difference between the "Realign Antenna" and the Front/Rear Designation" commands/buttons????

    Comments appreciated, thanks.
     
    whitex and dinkydi like this.
  3. nano

    nano Premium Member Intermediate User Premium Member

    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    276
    Country:
    Austria
    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Location:
    Europe
    So I did a comparison between 4.0.52 and 4.2.10 at two different stationary MRCD spots. It seems that 4.2.10 does a little better on MRCD, however it is not much:

    VIP_FW_difference.jpg
     
  4. hawk

    hawk Learning to Fly Beginner User

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    79
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2016
    Location:
    Florida
    Here is the reply I received from new Stinger USA support team:

    "Hello Xxx,

    Our terminology (and spelling..) is not quite right for this menu option, so let me try and bring clarity:

    Counter to what the name suggests, “Realign antennas’ internally calibrates the (electrical values of the) antennas and has nothing to do with switching the antenna orientation. In a future update we will reflect this, likely by renaming it “Recalibrate antennas”.

    Recalibrating, by the way, should only be useful under some special scenarios (like when the antennas are being reinstalled in a new vehicle, while the previous ‘host’ vehicle had certain on-board radar systems), but doing a calibration shouldn’t cause any downsides either.

    The option (to switch the orientation of the antennas) that you are looking for, can be found one setting further down (so the very last entry under ‘Settings’ > ‘Radar’), and is called “Front / Rear designation”.

    Choosing this should list all (both) connected antennas (sequentially numbered), each with their current directional designation (front or rear) and each with a switch button.
    Hitting “switch”, of course, will reverse the current directional designation for the corresponding antenna (so technically it would even be possible to designate both antennas as front, or both as rear).

    Hope this helps, and sorry for the confusion!

    If you have any further questions, please let us know.

    Kind regards,


    Malarie "
     
    whitex likes this.
  5. whitewiskers

    whitewiskers Learning to Drive General User

    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    16
    Country:
    Canada
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2013
    Thank you very much for getting back to us with this information. It would be much appreciated if, in the not-too-distant future, an operator's manual could be made available, so new and older hands would have a point of reference. This would allow for new system items to be included and explained at the time they are released. An electronic version of such a manual would allow for easier amendments.
    Thanks again for your prompt reply.
     
  6. jon5

    jon5 PSL + (O / U) Advanced User

    Messages:
    941
    Likes Received:
    662
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2016
    For what it's worth:
    I've driven around 1000 miles on this version now.

    1) It's much quieter at S-1F-1
    1a) Unfortunately, this may be a result of a prior falselist bug rearing it's head where BSMs get falselisted. (and then so do LEOs)
    2) Falselist appears to work again. I can't say for sure yet, but signals are staying falselisted. It may take another week for this bug to rear its head again. We'll see.
    3) Sensitivity Level seems to make a strikingly large difference with respect to detection range now.
    4) F-1 vs F+0, it does seem to filter GMs and Cadillacs. I haven't noticed much falsing from acuras, but that's always a mixed bag anyway. It definitely doesn't work on Honda odysseys still.
    5) The spectrum analyzer seems a lot more consistent. I can finally actually see the distinct BSM signals from a single car - usually 4 or 5, when i get a punchthrough.
    5a) This will probably be good for future filtering.

    Overall, i'll take it. Even deep city driving is pretty dang quiet.
     
    sdrawkcab and mikedotd like this.
  7. jdong

    jdong Premium Member Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    6,752
    Likes Received:
    9,174
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2013
    This sounds promising. It's definitely a step in the right direction in the spirit of the 4.x releases.
     
  8. mikedotd

    mikedotd Arrow enthusiast Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    3,757
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Location:
    New England
    Does anyone else think the BSM filtering in v4.2.10 was a regression from v4.0.52?

    Even with regular scan mode, BSM filtering set to the most filtering (all the way to the left) and sensitivity set to -2 mine is constantly alternating between alerting to and not alerting to BSM systems, while my other RD's remain quiet unless I'm on top of the source.

    I actually turned K-band off and left that duty to my V1 until recently when I brought the V1 inside and replaced it with the Max360 to see if the lockup issue is actually fixed by the latest firmware update. I turned K-band back on the VIP as a backup to the Max360 incase it does lockup and man, my single antenna VIP just won't shut up.

    After a week of running the Max360 (TSR off, Highway mode) I've had 2 BSM punch throughs. Today alone I had a Mercedes Benz and Honda set off the VIP while passing them, and the Max360 remained quiet.
     
    dinkydi and hawk like this.
  9. hawk

    hawk Learning to Fly Beginner User

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    79
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2016
    Location:
    Florida
    With BSM filtering set to the most filtering I experienced no improvement from v4.0.52 The directional arrows in v4.2.10 are definitely a regression from v4.0.52. Can't tell where the signal is coming from and that is why I rolled back to v4.0.52.
     
    dinkydi likes this.
  10. dinkydi

    dinkydi Premium Member Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    5,378
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Country:
    Australia
    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2011
    Location:
    back on the road again
    totally agree with both comments above, we roll can back and forth :bang: , just left mine on the latest see no point , as you know here in OZ we have very low power k stuff and that is all farked as well no matter what FW is in, that's why i just leave it
     
  11. jdong

    jdong Premium Member Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    6,752
    Likes Received:
    9,174
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2013
    Compliments for the Max360 filtering… compared to Stinger VIP….. Wow, what happened over the years!
     
    dinkydi likes this.
  12. Shanetrain

    Shanetrain PSL+10 Intermediate User Premium Member

    Messages:
    742
    Likes Received:
    567
    Country:
    Australia
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2013

    I have mentioned this a few times but U could ask stinger nicely if they will make u a custom bandlist (segmentation) file.

    If u know ALL the police radar frequencies in your area eg 24.150, 24.125 and so on, they can make u a special file that ignores a lot the K junk.

    I have asked stinger nicely for a tool to generate files like this as I think it could help the community get the very best out the VIP, version 4.2.10 is one of the best firmware they have produced.

    I have also attached a later HD V6.1.6, that also might be worth a try
     

    Attached Files:

    dinkydi, hawk and mikedotd like this.
  13. mikedotd

    mikedotd Arrow enthusiast Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    3,757
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Location:
    New England
    Thanks for the HD v6.1.6 file.

    It would be nice if they allowed us to create band segmentation on K-band ourselves. After years of running a V1 w/YaV1 I've learned in my area I can comfortably mute K-band outside of the 24.075 - 24.195 range (out of the box muting), but I'm seeing the VIP alert inside that bandwidth to cars that my other RD's don't. With the police center frequencies being 24.125 and 24.150GHz, I don't feel comfortable setting up notch filters inside that box either. Not to mention when I'm driving in a new area I'd rather be annoyed than ticketed because the frequency is out of the box (and at least the V1 will still visually indicate a signal, rather than ignoring it completely).

    The competition (V1, Escort, Radenso, Uniden) have figured out how to filter these BSM systems better than Stinger currently can, without resorting entirely on notch filters. The VIP has been less effective at filtering these BSM's, alternating between alerting and falselisting, while every other RD on the market will either alert, or not alert, no back and forth behavior unless you're crossing the threshold of signal strength. The VIP appears to have more than binary logic going on, and it's a completely annoying behavior.
     
  14. hawk

    hawk Learning to Fly Beginner User

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    79
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2016
    Location:
    Florida
    Thanks for the HD v6.1.6 file. I will give it a try with v4.2.10 and see if the directional arrow performance is any better. Will let you know.
     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2018
    Shanetrain likes this.
  15. nano

    nano Premium Member Intermediate User Premium Member

    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    276
    Country:
    Austria
    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Location:
    Europe
    I am also finding not a big difference in the new FW.

    However I found out, that K-Band is turned on when encountering a GPS marked location. Deleting the complete GPS database solved the issue.

    Can anyone confirm that Automute is disappeared? Strangly I can not find this anymore in the menu.

    Are you also running the latest beta FW4.2.201 in combination with the HD6.1.6? Can you comment on its performance?
     
    dinkydi likes this.
  16. dinkydi

    dinkydi Premium Member Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    5,378
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Country:
    Australia
    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2011
    Location:
    back on the road again
    yeh same here my spot list is triggered when it sees a genuine fixed gatso but not all of them just the odd ones, things are are just the usual mess
     
  17. dinkydi

    dinkydi Premium Member Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    5,378
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Country:
    Australia
    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2011
    Location:
    back on the road again
    automute still works fine only way to quieten bsm stuff

    incorrectly said auto mute was meaning the manual mute apoliges
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2018
  18. dinkydi

    dinkydi Premium Member Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    5,378
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Country:
    Australia
    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2011
    Location:
    back on the road again
    no good ,makes more falses
     
  19. hawk

    hawk Learning to Fly Beginner User

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    79
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2016
    Location:
    Florida
    My directional arrow performance seems much improved with HD v6.1.6 and firmware v4.2.10. Haven't driven all that much but, the improvement seems to warrant further testing.

    Thanks again

    UPDATE: Although the directional arrow performance was somewhat improved with HD v6.1.6 I was receiving too many k and BSM falses compared to firmware v4.0.52 even with car filter sensitivity set to -2. Rolled back to HD v6.1.1 and firmware v4.0.52.
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2018 at 4:07 PM