Pro M / RCM Ka Filters Tested 33.8

Discussion in 'Radenso' started by studio1930, Mar 18, 2018.

  1. studio1930

    studio1930 but it goes to 11 Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    1,530
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Location:
    Kansas City Area
    I wanted to test the Ka filters with Ka 33.8 to see how well the Radenso Pro M and RCM did and to see if it reduced the range in an off-axis, real-world scenario. Here are my findings.

    Gun: MPH Bee 36 with a Ka 33.8 antenna mounted in the center of the rear window of a Honda Accord.
    Course: Curved residential road 2400 feet long. Slight down and uphill. Cruise set at 30 mph.
    Detectors Tested: Radenso Pro M (US8 fw), Radenso RCM (Current US fw)
    Pro M Settings: Ka narrow, Ka filter Off/On. Auto-City X8, K4, Ka0.
    RCM Settings: Ka narrow, Ka filter Off/Normal/High, Auto-City X8, K4, Ka0. Rear antenna off.
    Runs: Three runs were performed for each detector with each setting (15 total runs). All results were consistent.

    Results: Both the Pro M and the RCM performed nearly identically with an average detection of 1907 feet for both Ka filter off and on (off / normal for RCM). There was no detectable difference with the Ka filter set to off as compared to having it set on in this real-world scenario (police often shoot in this very spot). This provided around 28 seconds of warning before entering the kill zone at the PSL.
    Ka Filter High, RCM: When the Ka filter was set to High on the RCM, the detection distance was often the same (1907 feet) but was sometimes 100 to 150' shorter. This is consistent with how the Radenso "High" filters have performed in the past. The distance is not always reduced but is sometimes slightly reduced if the signal is very weak.

    This image shows the course and the average results. The yellow line represents the various detection zone of the RCM when the Ka filter was set to High.
    prom_rcm_ka338_filter_test_3_18_2018.jpg

    Here is a video of one run so that you can see the course and the warning provided.


    Here is a bonus video showing the Pro M with a difficult downhill, 90-degree, FF (pointing away from the detector) detection. Ka narrow, Ka filter off.


    Disclaimer: One set of tests, two detectors, one radar source, low sample rate, test yourself, draw own conclusions, blah, blah, blah. :)
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2018
    Deacon, Blizzard, Z06fan and 15 others like this.
  2. InsipidMonkey

    InsipidMonkey Premium Monkey Advanced User Acceptus Premium Member

    Messages:
    3,946
    Likes Received:
    6,180
    Country:
    Iceland
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2017
    Location:
    New England
    Thanks for the test!

    Was Ka filter on or off on the Pro M in the bonus video?
     
    aocsgil, benzr, Choose Life and 2 others like this.
  3. studio1930

    studio1930 but it goes to 11 Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    1,530
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Location:
    Kansas City Area
    I updated the original thread. Ka filter was off, but I ran several more of those runs and it produced the same distance with the Ka filter on (sometimes slightly better probably due to reflections).
     
  4. InsipidMonkey

    InsipidMonkey Premium Monkey Advanced User Acceptus Premium Member

    Messages:
    3,946
    Likes Received:
    6,180
    Country:
    Iceland
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2017
    Location:
    New England
    Got it, thanks! That box truck as you turned the corner probably helped in the video, but still a pretty impressive FF/off-axis detection. Glad to hear Ka filter On doesn't seem to be impacting off-axis detections much now.

    Have you done any testing comparing Ka Wide and Ka Narrow? I've been running Wide on my Pro M due to out-of-tune Stalkers in NY, but I haven't had a chance to test whether I'm taking a significant range hit compared to Narrow.
     
    aocsgil, benzr and HotRodEV like this.
  5. studio1930

    studio1930 but it goes to 11 Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    1,530
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Location:
    Kansas City Area
    I have not tested narrow vs wide for Ka. I run narrow to eliminate my Jeep FCW radar falses which come in around the 34.3 area. I would love fully customizable segments.

    Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
     
    InsipidMonkey likes this.
  6. sschwar2

    sschwar2 Premium Member Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    377
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Thanks for the testing. How do you find BSM filtering on RCM?
     
  7. Heywood

    Heywood Learning Something New, Still Dying Stupid Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    1,648
    Likes Received:
    1,875
    Country:
    Canada
    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Location:
    Alberta Canada
    Nice test studio.
    Thanks.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  8. studio1930

    studio1930 but it goes to 11 Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    1,530
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Location:
    Kansas City Area
    Excellent. It is quiet most of the time. There are a few known trouble makers BSMs, but not many. I often forget it is turned on. Running K an Ka narrow probably helps.

    Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
     
  9. milkman

    milkman Premium Member Advanced User Acceptus Premium Member

    Messages:
    12,984
    Likes Received:
    3,897
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Location:
    Missouri
    Nice Test! Thanks for sharing.
     
  10. InsipidMonkey

    InsipidMonkey Premium Monkey Advanced User Acceptus Premium Member

    Messages:
    3,946
    Likes Received:
    6,180
    Country:
    Iceland
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2017
    Location:
    New England
    I still haven't had a single confirmed BSM false yet on my Pro M since US6. Running Highway, K Wide, TS Rej Low.

    @studio1930 What BSM falses have you seen? I'll keep a lookout for them.

    I do recall reading that someone noticed fewer falses running K Wide than K Narrow on one of the earlier FWs. Have you tried K Wide out of curiosity?

    Edit: I see the comment was regarding the RC-M. Have you had any BSM falses on the Pro M?
     
  11. studio1930

    studio1930 but it goes to 11 Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    1,530
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Location:
    Kansas City Area
    BSM confirmations to date. Green for no false alert; red for false alert. Only vehicles with visible yellow mirror light were tested indicating BSM was installed and active. Detector set to highway mode.

    Pro M and RCM:
    Ford Explorer Limited
    Toyota Camry XLE
    Hyundai Sonata Limited
    Chevy malibu LTR
    Ford Escape Titanium
    Toyota Rav 4 XLE
    GMC Yukon
    Ford Fusion Titanium

    Cadillac SRX4
    Mazda CX5
    Buick Enclave

    Lincoln MKC
    Lincoln MKX
    Subaru Crosstrek

    Cadillac XTS4 V (RCM only. Pro M not tested)
    GMC Denali Acadia

    Old Cadillac Escalade
    Lexus ES350
    Dodge Durango Citadel
    Rav4 Limited Hybrid
    Chevy Equinox
    M Benz GLE 450
    Hyundai Genesis
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2018
    benzr, Brainstorm69 and InsipidMonkey like this.
  12. InsipidMonkey

    InsipidMonkey Premium Monkey Advanced User Acceptus Premium Member

    Messages:
    3,946
    Likes Received:
    6,180
    Country:
    Iceland
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2017
    Location:
    New England
    Thanks for the list!

    I've been driving between a new CR-V and an Acura (both with BSM) with the Pro M and it has been quiet, which blew me away. Both cause my V1 and R3 to false.

    I'll go looking for some new Caddys, CX5s, and GMCs and see if I get any falses.
     
  13. synistyr

    synistyr PSL +15 Advanced User

    Messages:
    1,259
    Likes Received:
    947
    Country:
    Canada
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2014
    I'm getting an occasional BSM/MRCD false. I suspect it's from new Suburus but it's been hard to confirm.

    Anyone else?

    Running Gen2/US 8
    MRCD narrow/MR filter high




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  14. Choose Life

    Choose Life 35.5 hater R3 Day One User Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    7,080
    Likes Received:
    7,517
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2017
    Location:
    Charlotte North Carolina
    Has that been on BSM filter or +Tsr low/High
    Have you been able to quantify the delay on low/high?
    Is it any appreciable difference with/without bsm filter
     
  15. HotRodEV

    HotRodEV Ih8w8ing Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    1,572
    Likes Received:
    2,196
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2016
    Location:
    ATL
    Is that what that is?

    I put my RCM into KA Narrow pretty quickly to knock that frequency out, so didn't have enough time to see the pattern...
     
    benzr likes this.
  16. studio1930

    studio1930 but it goes to 11 Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    1,530
    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2016
    Location:
    Kansas City Area
    Yes, the Ka 34.3 band caused a few false alerts for me, especially from my Jeep. I'm glad Europe runs that band and not the US. I can't wait for car manufacturers to move to 77 GHz.
     
    HotRodEV likes this.
  17. InsipidMonkey

    InsipidMonkey Premium Monkey Advanced User Acceptus Premium Member

    Messages:
    3,946
    Likes Received:
    6,180
    Country:
    Iceland
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2017
    Location:
    New England
    I've run both TS Rej High and Low, but I usually run Low day-to-day (Note the Pro M has no separate K filter like the RC-M).

    I should try running TS Rej off again and see whether the later FWs still provide reasonable filtering in that mode. It does seem like it filters out the K band radar sensor I use for QT testing sometimes, so there is likely some always-on K filtering you can't disable (like the Unidens).

    The TSR filter on the Radensos seems to work differently than other TSR filters, in that it is not simply a delay. Even on TSR High it can react quickly to some signals, while completely ignoring others. It's really interesting, and I want to run more tests to try to figure out exactly whats going on.
     
  18. Choose Life

    Choose Life 35.5 hater R3 Day One User Advanced User Premium Member

    Messages:
    7,080
    Likes Received:
    7,517
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2017
    Location:
    Charlotte North Carolina
    I didnt know it did not have a separate bsm filter so definitely some other filtering going on

    My guess would be they needed the delay but so does uniden 300ms on the K filter
    Its probably 0.4 and 0.9 tsr low/high but thats a guess

    It would be very interesting to see the the differences off/low/high

    Uniden did have always on K filtering pre 1.31
    I could run it at 100% all the way through GA no k filter and the ramp up changed and only a few more falses
    But its reactivity could of possibly been cut 300ms

    After the 1.31 update it was unbearable to run filter off in traffic

    It will be interesting to see what fimware tweaks will do the pro m and R3 for that matter in the future
     
    InsipidMonkey likes this.
  19. InsipidMonkey

    InsipidMonkey Premium Monkey Advanced User Acceptus Premium Member

    Messages:
    3,946
    Likes Received:
    6,180
    Country:
    Iceland
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2017
    Location:
    New England
    I'm convinced they're using the extra information coming from the MRCD detection board added to the Pro M to filter out BSM, and it's working phenomenally well.

    AFAIK, all BSM radar is FMCW (or FM-Chirp/FM-Pulse) modulated since it needs to provide distance information. Some of these signals (eg the regular pulses) are easy to filter out, and manufacturers have had these figured out for awhile. Then there are the falses from Acuras and CR-Vs that are problematic for most detectors.

    [Speculation] I think this is due to the FM sweep used by these systems being quite narrow (on the order of 3 MHz), and detectors not being able to reliably distinguish this from CW radar. The addition of a MRCD board allows for more accurate identification of these FM modulated signals, and unambiguous rejection of these falses. [/Speculation]

    Even though I'm in the US, I did try running MRCD/MRCT/Gatso on for awhile (with MR Filter High) just to see what it was like, and it wasn't bad. Most of the falses were to Gatso (I was unable to identify what was setting it off), but if you can disable that band it's pretty well behaved. Interestingly, the vehicles that cause MRCD falses are very different than those that cause BSM falses. One example is new F150s which seem to reliably cause MRCD falses, but I've never seen them false K band on any detector.
     
    benzr and Blizzard like this.
  20. synistyr

    synistyr PSL +15 Advanced User

    Messages:
    1,259
    Likes Received:
    947
    Country:
    Canada
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2014

    Being deep in MRCD country I've only ever run MRCD on (narrow) ALL the time.

    Never had any falsing with Fords.

    That being said, falses always alerts as MRCD falses.

    What does it alert when you get a BSM false but with MRCD off?





    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk