IMO the only thing rdf will ever have as far as social media goes is public groups - mainly consisting of links to threads being posted. A private group would suggest that there is some information of some kind behind the curtain on a server which we have zero control over, and that should never be the case.Thanks for the info, just followed them both. I think having a private group would be great, maybe not?
Edited my post due to the typo, sorry.I'm pretty sure I'm on that list. If it was a private group with only confirmed RDF members (intermediate plus) I think it would be ok
That's why it's not required .I can't say that I would be very comfortable using my real name in a public forum like Facebook and ending up on some LEO's list of CM enthusiasts.