Affordable Radar Detector Testing - 5-17-15

Vortex

Making Videos
Administrator
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
19,786
Reaction score
37,196
Location
Washington State
Rating - 100%
9   0   0
detectors tested.jpg


We talk a lot about the high end detectors here and that's usually what we focus on. As such, I don't actually know all that much about the affordable options and so I've been curious how well the less expensive detectors in the ~$200 price range perform. How capable are those units, really? Are there some standout units that, if you're looking to save some cash, can give you a ton of bang for your buck? I hear a lot how "Cobras suck" and yet I hear from owners that they're getting saves and the detectors are nevertheless helping the avoid speeding tickets. Curious how much of a difference there really is, it's time to put together another test to find out. (Here's the last version of the test. It rained there and we had different/fewer detectors. This one is more comprehensive and the weather was great.)

For this test, we've got 10 different detectors, 4 different radar guns, and 2 different courses. One course is really easy and both high end and low end detectors can give you plenty of time for a save. It's an easy course with a long straightaway, but wasn't illustrating the point I was wanting to show. The second course is a more difficult course. It has some trees and curves and as such, helps separate the different classes of detectors and clearly shows how much of a difference there really is between detectors. This is really what I was hoping to test and what this test is all about. Seeing how much of a difference there is between detectors in more challenging situations.

If you'd like to see videos of the opposite ends of the spectrum, here's some comparison runs between the Redline and the Cobra. (It's meant to be a comprehensive standalone video so it is about 24 min long.) We run both courses here, starting with the easy course against 33.8, run both detectors on the tough course against 33.8, then 35.5 (harder to detect), and finally we run just the Redline against K band in both Highway/TSR off mode as well as Auto/TSR on to see how much range drops if you change the filtering settings.


So now that you get the idea of what we're looking to test, here's our contenders:

Top end detectors setting a baseline:
Escort Redline BS/RDR: (retail $500)
Valentine 1 3.8945: (retail $400)
Passport Max2 1.3: (retail $600)

Challengers:
Passport: (retail: $350)
RX65 M4: (discontinued, available online ~$130)
Uniden LRD950 1.35: (retail $400, online $200)
Whistler CR85: (retail $230, online $150)
K40 RLS2: (retail $400)
Cobra SPX 7800BT: (retail for $260, online $180)
Radenso Pro: (anticipated retail ~$489)

Radar guns:
MPH Bee III: 33.8
Stalker II: 34.7
Decatur Genesis II: 35.5
MPH Python II: K band

All detectors were set up for maximum sensitivity with the equivalent of 2/5/8 and RDR off, with the exception of the Radenso which I'll get into in a bit. Highway mode, TSR off for K band.

Radar Detector Course Info

Before we jump into the results, it's important to understand the layout of the course.

Course Map.jpg


The course length is about half a mile. Maximum detection range is at a red barn on the left side of the road. We then drive through some small S curves which help cut down on detection range. We then pass a gap in the trees where we have a visual line of sight of just under a quarter mile directly to the radar gun. Many detectors actually alert here. If they don't, I consider that pretty bad if I can actually see the radar vehicle at relatively close range and the detector doesn't alert. We want alerts at that point or farther away.

Here's a video driving down the course, pointing out a few of the relevant areas.


You'll notice that I'm running two cameras, one recording the detector, one recording the radar gun. When I get up to the radar car I quickly honk my horn so that I can make sure the two clips are perfectly in sync. This way I can see exactly how much time I have before the kill zone. I can also look back and see if there's any traffic going in either direction during the runs and see if that had any impact on the results. Videos in both directions were shot for all runs.

So now that we have that established, let's dive into the results. I'm going to show you the raw results first so you can see exactly what I saw, and then we'll talk about analyzing and interpreting the results.

Results

33.8:

33.8 Results Map.jpg


34.7:

34.7 Results Map.jpg


35.5:

35.5 Results Map.jpg


K Band:

K Band Results Map.jpg


So as you can see, we definitely have things broken up into clusters. The colors are somewhat arbitrary and detectors are grouped by clusters, but generally the yellow clusters are around that gap in the trees where we get line of sight to the radar vehicle. Green is before that gap which is good. Orange or red is if the detectors didn't alert in that gap which is bad.

Interpreting these results

Okay so this part is important. I spent hours and hours and hours going over all the video, figuring out exactly where the detectors went off, and plotting them out down to the pixel. So in the interest of precision and accuracy, what you see on the map is reflective of how the detectors fared. That said, if a detector goes off 10 feet before another detector, is it actually 0.1% more sensitive? I wouldn't say that.

I ran the detectors typically only one time, due to time constraints. Ideally I'd love to have 10 copies of each detector to account for sample variation, do 10 runs with each detector to see the consistency and weed out any outliers, have absolutely no traffic whatsoever (traffic was light fortunately, but did at times have an impact on the results), and so on. Heck, I'd love to even have not even a light breeze so that there'd be no movement in the branches and trees which could potentially block a radar signal or move and allow some to sneak through. I'd love to have ideal testing scenarios, but even doing as much as I can, realistically there's only so much I can do.

I did do a few different runs multiple times for different reasons and I did see fairly consistent results most of the time. However, if one detector happened to go off a second or two earlier the next run and another detector went off a second or two later the next run, detectors could easily swap positions and so just because you see one detector just before another, there really is some fudge factor that we're simply going to have to account for.

The way I would recommend looking at the results is to look at the trends. If one detector consistently does well, keep that in mind. If one detector consistently does poorly, keep that in mind.

Most of the results were what we expected. Things like the Redline typically leading the pack. V1 and Max2 generally behind somewhere. Other detectors in that area or below.

Some detectors had some interesting results, like the Passport actually winning out for the longest detection of the day on K band. It was the only detector to ever alert before the red barn. Would it have done this repeatedly if I did a bunch of runs? Maybe, maybe not.

The Cobra didn't do too hot overall, but that's to be expected. Unfortunately the Whistler was the worst performing detector out of the group. Not sure if it's that the Cobra got a little better, but it's a shame to see the Whistler get beat out by a Cobra. That said, the results are the results.

There were some odd things that happened like I got a freakishly long detection with the V1 on 35.5. Notice that range for everything is reduced there. When I got that long detection on the V1, I was driving towards the radar car and joehemi gets on the walkie talkie and radios in that a car and a bike had actually pulled into the gravel pullout and parked behind them. I'm positive this impacted the results. I reran the test because of this and the V1 dropped back down to normal like we expected.

Setting up the 35.5 course initially, I did a few passes with the Redline to figure out why detection range was so short. It looks like 35.5 is just harder to detect. However, I did find that the results were fairly consistent. That said, when I was making my actual test runs, the Redline got a nice long detection on 35.5. Unfortunately, halfway through the 35.5 testing I hear a beep coming from down in the passenger seat where all my other RD's were. The Radenso Pro went off and I realized that it had been running the entire time I was testing 35.5. Because of this, I had to chuck the results and restart 35.5 testing. This time, every detector actually did the same or even a little bit worse. Very odd... Maybe that detector causes interference in a good way? :p Maybe there is some inconsistency in the results that I can't account for. I've gone over the videos many many times and while there are some variables I can account for, there's some I can't which lead to a variability in the precision and consistency of the results.

At the end of the day, I think there's just some variability that, try as we might, we simply can't account for. For example, look at the Oct 2014 RD test results that the MWTC of ECCTG put on. You'll see some interesting stuff like K band testing where Redline#1 was at the top of the pack and Redline #2 is towards the bottom. The Max2 smoked everyone on 34.7, but was near the bottom of the pack on 35.5 where it got less than half the range of the top end performers. Redline #2 which was near the bottom on K band tops the list on 35.5.

So what I'm saying is weird stuff happens. No one test will tell you everything and give you the big picture. Multiple tests, a variety of courses, different backyard testers, different radar guns, multiple copies of detectors, different terrains and traffic conditions, heck even testing in clear conditions and in the rain. I think they all work together and when you look at the combination of test results all put together, you get a feel for the big picture. There's gonna be some weird things that happen that, try as we might, we may not be able to explain or account for. That's why I think it's better to look at lots and lots of tests and notice the overall trends and patterns. That's really the best way of approaching this, IMHO, not looking at any one test and trying to derive the ultimate answer from just that.

Speaking of multiple tests, I'm going to work on a post next talking about K band filtering. I did a lot of testing on K band to see how the different filtering options affected the performance of these detectors. Since this post is already fairly long and that's a related but different topic, I'll do another thread for that test. Edit: Here it is. www.rdforum.org: Testing how Auto Mode & TSR reduce range

Summary of each detector's performance

So with all that said, let's go over how each detector fared overall:

Escort Redline: As expected, the Redline generally led the field and was the leader for 33.8 and 34.7. It came in second on 35.5 to the Radenso Pro (impressive by the new detector!) but it also did even better than the Radenso on one of the earlier 35.5 runs that I had to throw away due to interference. It was also at the top of the pack on K band, being matched by the Uniden and actually beat by the Passport. Not sure what that was about, but hey...

Valentine 1: Consistently did very well. While it didn't win out any test individually, in the clusters it was in it generally did very well. For example, if you look at the gap where we had line of sight, notice that it alerted towards the front of the gap. Some of the other detectors took longer to alert once they could see the signal. This was a definite trend with the V1.

Passport Max2: Most expensive detector in the group. Generally performed similarly to the V1, yet would alert a bit afterwards. Notice how it's towards the rear of the pack in its respective clusters. This was an interesting trend and is consistent with my previous testing. I've never been able to confirm the claim that it has the longest range on all bands against all guns. It also had some interesting results with Auto and TSR which I'll get into in the other thread on that topic.

Passport: So given that it's the top performing M4 with BS/RDR, how much better would it do compared to the RX65 M4, an earlier version of the M4 platform? Well while it holds the honors of the longest detection of the day, it also performed in the same ballpark as the RX65 (makes sense), and yet it would sometimes alert behind the RX65 and even the other detectors in the pack. Look at the 34.7 and 35.5 results, for example. Very strange.

RX65 M4: Given the inexpensive price of this unit, it did very well. It's one of my top picks for an affordable option that still gets reasonable performance.

Uniden LRD950: It didn't always do well, given some of my previous tests, but it still holds its own and compares favorably with some of the other options out there. Given that it can be had now at $200 and has other features like GPS lockouts and low speed muting, it's an interesting option to consider. It was a little lacking on 33.8, but did well on 34.7, beating the V1 and Max2, and it did just fine on 35.5. It also did well on K band and I found out something incredibly interesting about its K band filtering performance, which again I'll address in the other thread.

Whistler CR85: Unfortunately, this was the worst performing detector of the group, even getting beat out by Cobra. The Whistler consistently did poorly. It came in last place for 33.8 and 34.7. It was second to last in 35.5 and again in K band. This is consistent with my previous testing I've done with the unit.

K40 RLS2: While this unit has an outstanding K band blind spot monitoring filter, its performance is pretty lacking and it's something that even K40 admits. They aim for quietness here, not sensitivity. It tended to trend towards the bottom of the pack and its $400 price tag is not backed up by its performance. It's also the only detector that does NOT let you turn off its K band filtering options and so while the other detectors were tested with K band filtering turned off, this one was tested with it turned on.

Cobra SPX 7800BT: Always glad to get a Cobra into the mix so we can see how well it fares. I had kinda assumed it would be the worst performer in the pack, because Cobra, and it's why I used it in my video comparing high end and low end detectors, but it actually did fairly decently on K band and generally beat out the Whistler. The thing falses to 35.5 a lot in practice when you encounter K band and given that its performance is terrible on 35.5, it definitely is a detector you want to avoid if 35.5 is used in your area. If you like the detector's bells and whistles, the Uniden is probably a better pick. That antenna platform is used in Cobra's more affordable detectors too so the performance will be the same as the other SPX series detectors, so if a person wants a less expensive unit, the RX65 M4 is probably the way to go.

Radenso Pro
: This was an interesting one to test. Here's the full discussion on this new detector. I found out about it 2 days before the test and had it overnighted to me since I was already gonna be doing this test anyways so it was a late entrant. It is a very solid performer on Ka band! It generally runs at the top of the pack and even beat out the Redline on 35.5. Very impressive performance. Actually, it's even more impressive considering it was being run with band segmentation turned off. Oddly enough, the unit incorrectly registers Ka band signals too low and if you turn segmentation on, it won't alert to legit Ka band signals. That's why I ran it turned off. If they fix this issue and segmentation actually improves performance, wow. On K band, however, it was really nothing special. Bottom of the pack performance, getting beat out by the Cobra. That's never a claim that you wanna make. This is something that they're addressing and I'm surprised to see that this is the case at all, especially since this was originally a European detector where K band detection is so important. Once they address its K band sensitivity, I'm curious to see how it fares.

Thank you!!

Finally, I wanna give a massive and huge thank you to everyone who helped out in this test. The majority of the equipment was supplied by other enthusiasts within the community, as well as some manufacturers and distributors. It's 100% because of this amazing community that this test can even happen. In the interest of full disclosure, here's who supplied each of the detectors:

Redline: @joehemi's personal copy
V1: My personal copy
Max2: My personal copy, provided by Escort originally for testing
Passport: @hiddencam's personal copy
RX65 M4: @kdo2milger's brand new personal copy
Uniden LRD950: @BestRadarDetectors' personal copy
Whistler CR85: @jdong's personal copy
K40 RLS2: Retail unit supplied by k40radar.com
Cobra SPX 7800BT: Retail unit supplied by @BestRadarDetectors for testing
Radenso Pro: First US production unit provided by the US distributor @Hügel66

Finally, a big thank you to @joehemi as well for helping find these courses and man the radar car during hours and hours and hours of testing. :)

Thank you for reading! Now let the discussions commence. :cheers:
 
Last edited:

milkman

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Acceptus
Newly Registered
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Messages
14,636
Reaction score
5,310
Location
Missouri
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

Edwv30

PSL +15
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
2,050
Reaction score
1,670
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks [MENTION=2404]Vortex[/MENTION] - an excellent review as always. The Uniden really is a sweet detector at the $200.00 price point. I have only ran into 34.7 and K band so far but my exoeriences are in line with your test results against the M4's. I think the Uniden has better off-axis and am hoping it's more reactive than my M4's. Not sure what happened with 33.8 but they run that here along with 35.5...just haven't ran into it yet. The Uniden will definitely be the detector I recommend if someone is on a budget.
 

Nine_C1

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
May 12, 2011
Messages
2,349
Reaction score
10,156
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
MOST EXCELLENT TEST there Vortex.:)

You have certainly become one of the BEST and most trusted independent testers out there. Now these results are 100% believable because you kept the faith and divulged everything in your results and THAT is important......because anyone who has actually run a real test knows that some really weird and unexpected things happen but usually the best detectors prevail overall.;)

And as you indicated, consistent great performance is a key measure and arguably much more important than any single trophy run since it only takes one bad performance in the real world to put points on your license.

That said...the RedLine and Valentine One basically justified their price tags once again while the Max2 failed to live up to it's $650 promise. Even so, it's a respectable performer and not far behind the V1 in radar performance, so if you bought it for the bells and whistles be happy that that is where your money went.

The real eye openers (delightfully so) are the new Uniden and Radenso Pro. My biggest concern is 34.7 followed by 35.5 and K-Band and the new Uniden appears to perform well above it's price range on these bands strongly challenging the V1! The Redenso still has some work to do to get there (especially at expected retail price) but we know they are still in development. From a hardware standpoint I think the Uniden LRD950 has an advantage having the same RF board as the Radenso but with the addition of an LNA sitting between the horn and mixer. The Radenso is running the equivalent of the LRD450 board without the LNA......I know the Radenso rep says it's actually a different board but the photos I posted show they use the exact same blueprint without question. So I think better hardware goes to the Uniden and better firmware goes to the Randenso.

I expect these new detectors with this kind of performance and quick response will challenge Escort's M4 models and put Whislter out of business over time if they don't get off their arse and do something. And Cobra who???
 

Jag42

TXCTG RD tester / US TMG a-15 dealer.
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
MFG/Vendor
Newly Registered
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
8,325
Reaction score
14,936
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Thanks for the time and great test. First I wanted a Uniden, now a Radenso has my decision.
 

Tallyho

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
2,346
Reaction score
3,837
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Nice visuals. Excellent job with not only the testing but also putting this together where we can see all the results laid out so clearly for each band/detector.

I can't help but notice this is another lackluster test on 34.7 for the V1. It appears to be a pattern:

https://www.rdforum.org/showthread.php?t=42807&p=568552&viewfull=1#post568552

https://www.rdforum.org/showthread.php?t=42807&page=5&p=568704&viewfull=1#post568704

Of course the perplexing issue is we haven't pinpointed the reason why a factory default, non-custom swept V1 doubled the 34.7 range performance compared to a custom swept V1.

Can you clarify if this was a V1C?
 
Last edited:

Hügel66

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
MFG/Vendor
Newly Registered
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,358
Reaction score
5,450
Location
Northern Kentucky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Absolutely amazing test. Kudos to [MENTION=2404]Vortex[/MENTION] and [MENTION=4336]joehemi[/MENTION] for their enthusiasm and great work.
Even better are the test evaluations. Astonishing.

I am glad that I contacted [MENTION=2404]Vortex[/MENTION] right on time to have the Radenso Pro included in the test. That was literally last minute arrival! Although the unit still had some known flaws (weak K Band performance and miscalibrated frequency) I wanted to see how it measures against the leaders of the pack in an independent, non biased and no bullshit test.
The engineers in Europe are working on the issues and hopefully the final version will be available soon. We are not touching Ka Band performance but look into significant K band performance increase. It might still not compete with Redline on K yet but it will be a lot closer.
The frequency misreading is a calibration issue. The unit [MENTION=2404]Vortex[/MENTION] was testing is actually the first US tuned detector (it still has the european brand name printed on).
When I started to test the unit it did not have frequency display nor K-Band TSR filter. These features were made available to me by uploading new firmware.
However, to have more accurate frequency detection each unit has to be calibrated in the factory. So we knew that we would be off quite a bit by just uploading new firmware.
Once the frequency is captured with greater accuracy the unit can be switched into Ka Narrow mode which will improve Ka band range even more. The tests on 33.8, 34.7 and 35.5 were all run with Ka wide band selection.

Again, awesome test. Thanks for investing so much time to do all the testing and evaluations.
 

PointerCone

M3 Kng
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
22,968
Reaction score
22,387
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Awesome [MENTION=2404]Vortex[/MENTION] , 2015 Member of the Year :)
 
Last edited:

hiddencam

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
10,930
Reaction score
21,651
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Wow man, you've excelled yourself.

Very cool presentation of a most excellent comparative test!

HUGE Thanks for the enormous work you put into this. The attention to detail, accuracy and excellence is impressive.

This test really drills down on exactly what budget-minded people should be focusing on when in the market for a detector. Really stoked about the new offerings and their performance. Might have to pick up a Uniden for testing.

Definitely shocked the Passport took the K-band longest detection!! I knew it was very good from my own testing (https://www.rdforum.org/showthread.php?t=41471&p=548799&viewfull=1#post548799) back in January, but I didn't expect it to do that! lol.

Mugs up to you Vortex. I raise a glass in your honor.
 

PointerCone

M3 Kng
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
22,968
Reaction score
22,387
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Thank you for reading! Now let the discussions commence............


***. Not much to discuss , once again the King showed his superiority on not only Ka but K as well........***

wonderful testing gentlemen ;)

i do like the fact that the Radenso shows a lot of promise...........
 

kdo2milger

BELTRONICS Performance Rules
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Mar 6, 2015
Messages
1,974
Reaction score
1,197
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@Vortex

This was worth the wait! You have set a new standard once again! This is the most complex and in-depth independent review I have ever read!

I have to say I am proud to see that the RX65M4 is holding it's own with the Big Dogs (RL and V1), ever since I took a chance on Belscorts little sibling I have been very happy with it's performance to date. The RX is the best entry level windshield unit available imo, (can be had for 109 shipped from Buydig's eBay store). I can't help but wonder if the RX could do a little better if it was updated via EL, disabling SWS. Supposedly the disabling of SWS on the RX improves the radars overall performance.

The RP shows real potential, this is a welcomed entry into a competitive market. I think once refined the RP is going to be a great little unit and I say that because the group behind it wants to see it succeed and do well in a competitive arena. It's that drive and determination behind Genevo that will propel the RP to the next level. One of the Improvements to the RP should be the RF Board, adding the LNA that the 950 has and K band improvement of course.

Sadly for the LRD950, it could have a bright future if only Uniden would give it the love it deserves, especially in regards to the RL/SC database and software.

I am not at all surprised at the Whistler CR85's performance, what you experienced with your testing results is exactly what I experienced in the two weeks I owned one.

Thanks @joehemi for all the support too, I appreciate the level of effort that went into this test.

Edited for Beltronics RX65 M4 price is 139: http://www.ebay.com/itm/331562651345?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT

 
Last edited:

ahl395

PSL?
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
1,500
Reaction score
889
Location
New Jersey, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Amazing and awesome work, thank you very much for taking the time to do this testing and post the results :)
 

THRASH

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
594
Reaction score
277
Location
ATL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You're the man. Enough said!
 

ykobzar2

Premium Member
Premium Member
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
290
Reaction score
270
Location
Seattle, WA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
[MENTION=2404]Vortex[/MENTION]: thanks for the complete and thorough review. Without doubt, you are one of the best independent testers I have witnessed to-date! Your work truly impacts the community (users and manufacturers alike). It's great to know that we have someone we can trust that will give us the complete picture!
 

Nine_C1

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
May 12, 2011
Messages
2,349
Reaction score
10,156
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Absolutely amazing test. Kudos to [MENTION=2404]Vortex[/MENTION] and [MENTION=4336]joehemi[/MENTION] for their enthusiasm and great work.
Even better are the test evaluations. Astonishing.

I am glad that I contacted [MENTION=2404]Vortex[/MENTION] right on time to have the Radenso Pro included in the test. That was literally last minute arrival! Although the unit still had some known flaws (weak K Band performance and miscalibrated frequency) I wanted to see how it measures against the leaders of the pack in an independent, non biased and no bull$#@! test.
The engineers in Europe are working on the issues and hopefully the final version will be available soon. We are not touching Ka Band performance but look into significant K band performance increase. It might still not compete with Redline on K yet but it will be a lot closer.
The frequency misreading is a calibration issue. The unit [MENTION=2404]Vortex[/MENTION] was testing is actually the first US tuned detector (it still has the european brand name printed on).
When I started to test the unit it did not have frequency display nor K-Band TSR filter. These features were made available to me by uploading new firmware.
However, to have more accurate frequency detection each unit has to be calibrated in the factory. So we knew that we would be off quite a bit by just uploading new firmware.
Once the frequency is captured with greater accuracy the unit can be switched into Ka Narrow mode which will improve Ka band range even more. The tests on 33.8, 34.7 and 35.5 were all run with Ka wide band selection.

Again, awesome test. Thanks for investing so much time to do all the testing and evaluations.
You done good in choosing a reputable forum and a VERY reputable forum member to evaluate your product. Your trust factor is riding at 100% so far.:p I have to commend these European companies (insert Stinger and Radenso here) for deciding to work through the educated enthusiast community as opposed to signing up with the circus clowns to be advocates for your product. Of course, it really helps when you have a good product.;)

Wow man, you've excelled yourself.

Very cool presentation of a most excellent comparative test!

HUGE Thanks for the enormous work you put into this. The attention to detail, accuracy and excellence is impressive.

This test really drills down on exactly what budget-minded people should be focusing on when in the market for a detector. Really stoked about the new offerings and their performance. Might have to pick up a Uniden for testing.

Definitely shocked the Passport took the K-band longest detection!! I knew it was very good from my own testing (https://www.rdforum.org/showthread.php?t=41471&p=548799&viewfull=1#post548799) back in January, but I didn't expect it to do that! lol.

Mugs up to you Vortex. I raise a glass in your honor.
Yeah but......look at how it performs on Ka.....yikes! That is also in line with what I saw when testing the new Passport, absolutely dreadful around the bend Ka performance.

Then look at the RX65, another M4 that performed much better on those bands. You know, I told Escort what the issue was with the Passport and it's gawd awful off-axis Ka performance but they have not the ability to actually listen. It's the front lens......it's more of a hindrance than a help being an irregularly shaped cosmetic cover as opposed to a well formed condenser lens.

Take that cover off and you will see Ka detection range improve.;)
 

hiddencam

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
10,930
Reaction score
21,651
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Yeah but......look at how it performs on Ka.....yikes! That is also in line with what I saw when testing the new Passport, absolutely dreadful around the bend Ka performance.

Then look at the RX65, another M4 that performed much better on those bands. You know, I told Escort what the issue was with the Passport and it's gawd awful off-axis Ka performance but they have not the ability to actually listen. It's the front lens......it's more of a hindrance than a help being an irregularly shaped cosmetic cover as opposed to a well formed condenser lens.

Take that cover off and you will see Ka detection range improve.;)
Indeed!! Definitely sobering ... and I won't be using it on the highway much!!! Lol.

Thanks for the lens tip! Actually, it comes at a good time because I'm currently pondering/testing (k-band) a few new things for the V1 and Passport, and really want to add the Passport-minus-front-lens tip to a ka test.

Who wants to loan me a ka gun? :D
 

Hügel66

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
MFG/Vendor
Newly Registered
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,358
Reaction score
5,450
Location
Northern Kentucky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You done good in choosing a reputable forum and a VERY reputable forum member to evaluate your product. Your trust factor is riding at 100% so far. I have to commend these European companies (insert Stinger and Radenso here) for deciding to work through the educated enthusiast community as opposed to signing up with the circus clowns to be advocates for your product. Of course, it really helps when you have a good product.
You are absolutely right about that. I saw all of [MENTION=2404]Vortex[/MENTION] reviews and tests and they could not have been more straight forward and independent and FAIR. I would have never asked for a test with someone where the results have already been compiled before the test has commenced...
Thanks for the compliment. So far so good but nobody than myself knows that there is still a lot to do. I do not want to offer an inferior or mediocre product and I know it will be a tough battle to position the company as a legitimate contender. I have been offering the Genevo products in my European webshop "radarmeister" for quite some time and saw the potentials. It is now selling better than Escort or V1 products in that market. I know what they are developing right now and this gave me the confidence to launch their products here.
I am fully aware that we have to weather storms and droughts. It won't be easy but I have realistic expectations. I don't expect that anyone dumps their V1, Escort or Bel and it will be a long ride to make some impact. Building trust will take some time and requires a consistently good product. There is no better place than this forum to get the feedback that will help make the product better and better. In the thread about Radenso I already picked up some very good suggestions and hope that some of them can get implemented.
 

Vortex

Making Videos
Administrator
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
19,786
Reaction score
37,196
Location
Washington State
Rating - 100%
9   0   0
There is no better place than this forum to get the feedback that will help make the product better and better. In the thread about Radenso I already picked up some very good suggestions and hope that some of them can get implemented.
You know, one of my favorite experiences testing the Radenso so far is what happened when I reported the results of 67 ms Ka band POP testing. The detector has that feature available but is completely unable to detect it. When I shared my findings, your response was immediately to go out and acquire a gun that has this capability so you can see exactly what POP is like and how to detect it properly, despite the fact that POP detection really doesn't matter in the end and most of us will run with POP off anyways. Having features work, especially if you advertise them, is mandatory, IMHO.

I can't emphasize how huge it is to have a manufacturer listen to customer's bug reports and actually go out and solve them. I see this with the ALP and with Stinger, and while I can't comment on Radenso's turnaround speed and ability to implement the fixes yet, what I can see from the initial responses and receptiveness to addressing the limitations of the detector looks very promising.

There's some companies and products that advertise features and capabilities that they aren't able to actually provide and we can point out issues and problems 'till we're blue in the face. I'm sure you guys know what I'm talking about. Some issues may take years to get addressed, some will never get addressed at all.

I really like seeing when a company's sales, marketing, and advertising is all backed up by solid engineering capability in general. It's one of the things that you won't see listed on a sales page, just like the quality of customer service and support, the turnaround speed of repairs, or the long term reliability of the units and how many of them will break down and need to be sent back for repairs. In the same way, having the manufacturer listen to its customers and implement important features in a timely fashion not something that you'll see advertised on a sales page or on a performance test like this, but it's a hugely important part of the big picture and I believe manufacturers deserve to be recognized when they have this part nailed.

Thanks for the lens tip! Actually, it comes at a good time because I'm currently pondering/testing (k-band) a few new things for the V1 and Passport, and really want to add the Passport-minus-front-lens tip to a ka test.

Who wants to loan me a ka gun? :D

Man, that'd be an awesome test to see done. If my want my Stalker II, just say the word and it's headed your way.

Can you clarify if this was a V1C?
Yes, it's a V1C. Ka guard off, segmented with the standard built-in YaV1 sweeps for 33.8, 34.7, 35.5.
 
Last edited:

Tallyho

Premium Member
Premium Member
Advanced User
Intermediate User
Beginner User
General User
Newly Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
2,346
Reaction score
3,837
Rating - 100%
1   0   0


Yes, it's a V1C. Ka guard off, segmented with the standard built-in YaV1 sweeps for 33.8, 34.7, 35.5.

Thanks, at least we have consistency. Continued poor performance on 34.7 with YaV1 sweeps. :confused:
 
Last edited:

Donation drives

RDF Server & License Fees (Jan/Feb 2019)

This donation drive covers the server and licensing fees for RDF for the months of January and February 2019...
Goal
$795.00
Earned
$800.00
This donation drive ends in

Latest threads

Social Group Activity

Forum statistics

Threads
78,301
Messages
1,164,718
Members
18,005
Latest member
Aviator92
Top