Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 131

Thread: Veil Guy's Review: Valentine One v3.894 with V1connection LE module

[P] Discuss meets/results from the various testing groups here.

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,414
    Wiki Actions
    0/0
    Thanks Given
    1,107
    Thanked 1,961 Times in 810 Posts
    iTrader Score
    0
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Advanced User
    This user is banned from Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum Authorized Manufacturer or Vendor

    Veil Guy's Review: Valentine One v3.894 with V1connection LE module

    Part I of the multi-part series, which begins with an overall summation, first: Short and sweet.

    Veil Guy's Review: Valentine One v3.894 with V1connection LE module Part I

    PS: No it is not and Ad! But a brief summation of the review and I am allowing Mr. Valentine to offer his own words (by referring to VR's website). Full deep-dive review coming shortly. Needed a complete rewrite, sorry.

    VG
    Last edited by Veil Guy; 07-09-2014 at 05:37 AM.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Veil Guy For This Useful Post:

    GTO_04 (07-05-2014)

  3. #2

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,164
    Wiki Actions
    0/0
    Thanks Given
    18,947
    Thanked 2,353 Times in 1,310 Posts
    iTrader Score
    0
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Advanced User
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - VIP Member
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Premium Member

    Social Group: Midwest Testing Chapter Social Group: The Christian Core

    Re: Veil Guy's Review: Valentine One v3.894 with V1connection LE module

    I clicked on "PERFECTION" and it took me to the V1 website.

    GTO_04
    V1 3.893 (1.8A)
    BEL STi Magnum BS/RDR
    Escort Redline BS/RDR (2)
    Kustom Talon
    Uniden 396XT
    Uniden 996XT
    Uniden 780XLT
    Uniden 796XLT
    GRE PSR-500
    Unication G5 Digital Voice Pager
    2015 Dodge Charger Scat Pack 392
    2006 Pontiac GTO

  4. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Hickory, NC
    Posts
    638
    Wiki Actions
    0/0
    Thanks Given
    784
    Thanked 217 Times in 136 Posts
    iTrader Score
    0
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Advanced User
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - VIP Member
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Premium Member

    usa

    Re: Veil Guy's Review: Valentine One v3.894 with V1connection LE module

    This suppose to be a joke VG? I expected to read a long intense review here.

  5. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,414
    Wiki Actions
    0/0
    Thanks Given
    1,107
    Thanked 1,961 Times in 810 Posts
    iTrader Score
    0
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Advanced User
    This user is banned from Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum Authorized Manufacturer or Vendor

    Re: Veil Guy's Review: Valentine One v3.894 with V1connection LE module

    Normally I am a man of many words. Doh!

    Part I is my coining, subjective, one word summation and attribution.

    I'm letting Mr. Valentine and company to have their voice heard since they aren't directly engaged formally if at all on this forum.

    It's my deference to their accomplishment.

    The wordy and intense review will be coming. I have to start over in light of recent events, which is a very good thing.

    I've decided not to send my unit out for observation. Sorry. But the more I think about it, now that I have corrected my messaging of a couple of days ago (dropping the reference to 'king,' Nine's word)), I don't feel the need to have a subjective opinion be tested with controlled objective means as a result of my retraction.

    The word 'King' was the wrong (literal) word because it came off as if I were insensitive to certain members here. My intention and feelings have not changed, mind you and, in fact, I feel more emphatic about my feelings, but I have come to realize that the word itself carried a certain meaning more than the word itself.

    To my was of thinking, the word King is a very broad word to represent objective results of some characteristics that are measurable and repeatable. It carries connotations with its meaning.

    I am now using that one word, because like Nine about his Redline, I feel the word is most apt for the V1 with particular sweeping patterns and other settings and a more accurate and descriptive representation of the unit. (Hey, who says that aren't more than one King in this world, hah!)

    Seriously, though, like the original segmented observations of the first remote M3, I myself attributed words to the same sentiment, such as:top of the detector food chain, summiting mount-Everest. You guys later confirmed those empirical observations with your own units and have attributed a short one word description of the same final conclusion.

    I'd prefer at this point the same thing happens in whatever manner these other fellows deem appropriate.

    Like Nike feels, this hot little puppy is not going out of my sight.

    I hope there can be the same type of corellation between my methodology and theirs. And if not, then so be it.

    Members here will either accept my proclamation here or reject it.

    Either way, that's OK because again my claim is subjective and likely not testable in a closed course setting.

    Now I am really trying to get some sleep. I am really exhausted at this point. Why are discussions of V1 versus everything else always seem to end up in heated argument?

    laters...

    VG
    Last edited by Veil Guy; 07-09-2014 at 05:47 AM.

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Veil Guy For This Useful Post:

    jrollercoasters (07-06-2014), KASHER1979 (07-06-2014), milkman (07-06-2014)

  7. #5
    Keeping RDF Secure
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    10,427
    Wiki Actions
    0/0
    Thanks Given
    7,941
    Thanked 7,266 Times in 3,677 Posts
    iTrader Score
    9
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Advanced User
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Administrator
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - VIP Member
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Premium Member

    Social Group: Android Social Group: Escort Army Social Group: Law Talk Social Group: The Christian Core

    Re: Veil Guy's Review: Valentine One v3.894 with V1connection LE module

    Quote Originally Posted by Veil Guy View Post
    Normally I am man of many words.

    Part I is my coining, subjective , one word summation and attribution.

    I' letting Mr. Valentine and company to have their voice heard since they aren' directly engaged formally if at all on this forum.

    It' my deference to their accomplishment.

    The wordy and intense review will be coming. I have to start over in light of recent events, which is very good thing.

    I've decided not to send my unit out for observation. Sorry. But the more I think about it, now that I have corrected my messaging of couple of days ago, I don' feel the need to have subjective opinion be tested with controlled objective means as result of my retraction.

    The word King was the wrong word because I have come to realize with the help of some trusted friends here, that that word came with objective testing and collective conclusions of lot of smart people who tested the Redline during my four year absence from participation here. My intention and feelings have not changed, in fact, I feel more emphatic about my feelings. Nine et. company coined the word and I was unintentionally insentive to meaning.

    The word King in my view uses broad word to represent objective results of some characteristics that are measureable and repeatable. It carries connotations with meaning.

    I am now using that one word, because like Nine about his Refline, I feel the word is most apt for the V1 with particular sweeping patterns and other settings and more accurate and descriptive representation of the unit.

    Like the original segmented observations of the first remote M3, I felt it was the top of the detector food chain at the time. You guys later confirmed those empirical observations with your own units.

    I' prefer at this point the same thing happens in whatever manner these other fellows deem appropriate.

    Like Nime, this puppy is not going out of my sight.

    I hope there can be the same type of corellation between my methodology and theirs. And if not, then so be it.

    Members here will either accept my proclamation here or reject it.

    Either way, that' OK because again my claim is subjective and likely not testable in closed course setting.

    Now I am really trying to get some sleep. I am overtired and that is precarious position to be in for someone diagnosed as being bipolar.

    Until later today...

    VG
    Rest well VG. You have been doing a lot of good work. Rest assured that it has not gone void and we are reaping benefits from your findings, even if it didn't turn out exactly as planned.

    ---------- Post added at 02:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:17 AM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by oddpedestrian View Post
    This suppose to be joke VG? I expected to read long intense review here.
    He will get the review soon enough. For now the word perfection really sums it up! But that wouldn't be possible without our fellow member Franky!!!!

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to KASHER1979 For This Useful Post:

    Windstrings (07-06-2014)

  9. #6
    Blatant disrespect for PSL
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    New Port Richey, Florida
    Posts
    2,463
    Wiki Actions
    0/0
    Thanks Given
    956
    Thanked 2,420 Times in 990 Posts
    iTrader Score
    1
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Advanced User
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Premium Member

    usa

    Re: Veil Guy's Review: Valentine One v3.894 with V1connection LE module

    I think it is time to have a (Custom Sweep) Redline,V1 .94,.93 shootout. What do you guys think?
    Last edited by Freebird; 07-06-2014 at 03:30 AM.
    2014 Focus ST
    2016 Suzuki GSXS 1000

  10. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Hickory, NC
    Posts
    638
    Wiki Actions
    0/0
    Thanks Given
    784
    Thanked 217 Times in 136 Posts
    iTrader Score
    0
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Advanced User
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - VIP Member
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Premium Member

    usa

    Re: Veil Guy's Review: Valentine One v3.894 with V1connection LE module

    Quote Originally Posted by Freebird View Post
    I think it is time to have a (Custom Sweep) Redline,V1 .94,.93 shootout. What do you guys think?
    I think it's time to finish the book and move on. I like to see a software review, like a serious one between El, YaV1, trapster, Waze etc.

  11. #8
    Blatant disrespect for PSL
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    New Port Richey, Florida
    Posts
    2,463
    Wiki Actions
    0/0
    Thanks Given
    956
    Thanked 2,420 Times in 990 Posts
    iTrader Score
    1
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Advanced User
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Premium Member

    usa

    Re: Veil Guy's Review: Valentine One v3.894 with V1connection LE module

    Quote Originally Posted by oddpedestrian View Post
    I think it's time to finish the book and move on. I like to see a software review, like a serious one between El, YaV1, trapster, Waze etc.
    Wouldn't you like to know what sweeps perform best? Wouldn't you like to know if 3.894 performs better than 3.893?
    2014 Focus ST
    2016 Suzuki GSXS 1000

  12. #9

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Hickory, NC
    Posts
    638
    Wiki Actions
    0/0
    Thanks Given
    784
    Thanked 217 Times in 136 Posts
    iTrader Score
    0
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Advanced User
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - VIP Member
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Premium Member

    usa

    Re: Veil Guy's Review: Valentine One v3.894 with V1connection LE module

    Quote Originally Posted by Freebird View Post
    Wouldn't you like to know what sweeps perform best? Wouldn't you like to know if 3.894 performs better than 3.893?
    Nope the whole issue became a lot more then just that. I'll just lurk on it.

  13. #10
    Blatant disrespect for PSL
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    New Port Richey, Florida
    Posts
    2,463
    Wiki Actions
    0/0
    Thanks Given
    956
    Thanked 2,420 Times in 990 Posts
    iTrader Score
    1
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Advanced User
    Radar Detector & Laser Jammer Forum - RDForum - Premium Member

    usa

    Re: Veil Guy's Review: Valentine One v3.894 with V1connection LE module

    Quote Originally Posted by oddpedestrian View Post
    Nope the whole issue became a lot more then just that. I'll just lurk on it.
    I could do without the drama also, but I would like to know what sweeps work best to run on my unit.
    2014 Focus ST
    2016 Suzuki GSXS 1000

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Freebird For This Useful Post:

    Chromatic (07-08-2014), colloyd00 (07-06-2014)


 
Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright © 2011 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Google Authenticator verification provided by Two-Factor Authentication v1.0.4 (Free) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
P